<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="birtic-etal-2022-croatian">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Croatian repository for the argument/adjunct distinction – SARGADA</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Matea</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Birtić</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Ivana</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Brač</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Siniša</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Runjaić</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2022-09</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2022)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Department of Computational Linguistics, IBL – BAS</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Sofia, Bulgaria</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>The distinction between arguments and adjuncts is a relevant topic in many linguistic theories (Tesniere, 1959; Chomsky, 1981; Langacker, 1987; Van Valin, 2001; Herbst, 2014, etc.). Even though theories provide similar definitions of arguments and adjuncts, sometimes it is difficult to draw a clear line between them. In order to determine ambiguous syntactic parts as arguments or adjuncts, various tests have been proposed, but they often give contradictory results and are not fully reliable. Nevertheless, they can be used as an auxiliary tool. The project Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Arguments and Adjuncts in Croatian – SARGADA was launched with the aim of thoroughly investigating the distinction between arguments and adjuncts in Croatian, and to apply the theoretical results in a syntactic repository which would be a valuable resource for improving NLP tools and for researching and teaching Croatian. In this paper, we will present diagnostic tests chosen as a tool to distinguish between arguments and adjuncts in the Croatian language. The repository containing sentences with ambiguous syntactic phrases and our workflow will also be described.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">birtic-etal-2022-croatian</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.clib-1.25/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2022-09</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>225</start>
            <end>233</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Croatian repository for the argument/adjunct distinction – SARGADA
%A Birtić, Matea
%A Brač, Ivana
%A Runjaić, Siniša
%S Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2022)
%D 2022
%8 September
%I Department of Computational Linguistics, IBL – BAS
%C Sofia, Bulgaria
%F birtic-etal-2022-croatian
%X The distinction between arguments and adjuncts is a relevant topic in many linguistic theories (Tesniere, 1959; Chomsky, 1981; Langacker, 1987; Van Valin, 2001; Herbst, 2014, etc.). Even though theories provide similar definitions of arguments and adjuncts, sometimes it is difficult to draw a clear line between them. In order to determine ambiguous syntactic parts as arguments or adjuncts, various tests have been proposed, but they often give contradictory results and are not fully reliable. Nevertheless, they can be used as an auxiliary tool. The project Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Arguments and Adjuncts in Croatian – SARGADA was launched with the aim of thoroughly investigating the distinction between arguments and adjuncts in Croatian, and to apply the theoretical results in a syntactic repository which would be a valuable resource for improving NLP tools and for researching and teaching Croatian. In this paper, we will present diagnostic tests chosen as a tool to distinguish between arguments and adjuncts in the Croatian language. The repository containing sentences with ambiguous syntactic phrases and our workflow will also be described.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.clib-1.25/
%P 225-233

Markdown (Informal)

[Croatian repository for the argument/adjunct distinction – SARGADA](https://aclanthology.org/2022.clib-1.25/) (Birtić et al., CLIB 2022)

• Croatian repository for the argument/adjunct distinction – SARGADA (Birtić et al., CLIB 2022)

ACL

• Matea Birtić, Ivana Brač, and Siniša Runjaić. 2022. Croatian repository for the argument/adjunct distinction – SARGADA. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2022), pages 225–233, Sofia, Bulgaria. Department of Computational Linguistics, IBL -- BAS.